Wednesday, February 19, 2014

BUSTER PUZZLE ANSWER







The correct answer to the question I asked in my previous post about BUSTER issue dated February 16th, 1980 is that it happens to be the one thousandth edition of the title. This is not mentioned on the cover or anywhere inside, and in all likelihood IPC were unaware that it was their landmark number, or they would have exploited this for promotion purposes. 

EDIT 11th January, 2016: some new information has recently come to my attention and it turns out that BUSTER No. 1000 actually had the cover date of 12th January, 1980. The cover and some comments are provided in this post HERE. This proves once again that researching old comics is an ongoing and live process :)

Differently from DC Thomson, Fleetway and IPC didn’t number their comics and we know they weren’t very good at keeping their count accurate, as illustrated by the example of WHOOPEE! dated November 5th, 1983 that was celebrated as No. 500 although in fact it was the 494th weekly edition published in the 504th week of publication.

BUSTER No. 1,000 came out in the 1,029th week of publication. The whole run of BUSTER consists of 1,902 issues published over a period of 1,984 weeks. The last 45 editions were fortnightlies; from 1994 onwards bumper X-mas editions covered a period of two weeks each; there were two double-dated issues in 1970 and the industrial action/production difficulties of the 70s and the 80s (to a lesser extent) are responsible for the remaining part of the deficit.

6 comments:

  1. The same sort of thing happened with Whizzer & Chips, although, given the circumstances, it's understandable as to why. The 21st Anniversary ish of the comic came and went unheralded. The very next week, the last issue was published before the title merged with Buster. Don't suppose there's much point in celebrating 21 years when you know that the next issue is going to be the last one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, in the case of Buster the end was still two decades away! I think they simply didn't now this was their 1000th edition.

      Delete
  2. Is it a pure coincidence that very soon after there was the first real logo change Buster had ever had? Sure, the original logo had been elongated, stretched and compacted various times since 1960, but the orange logo with broken white lines within was new – and incidentally roughly the point I became a reader. 1980 had been a bit hit-and-miss before this point, with gaps in the run and more to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed! They introduced the new logo merely a couple of weeks later on 8th March, 1980.

      Delete
  3. Interesting to read that Whoopee’s 500th edition, wasn’t. That’d mean there were 567 editions, rather than the 573 I’d always thought. Yes, I’m that sad! Don’t see what was so special about celebrating with the Guy Fawkes mask. They blew the dust off it every year!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The link given in the update (http://kazoop.blogspot.lt/?zx=fc680f6f7041cfc5) does not work. You may want to change this to (http://kazoop.blogspot.com/2016/01/how-many-issues-make-full-run-of-buster.html) so that the link works. :)


    ReplyDelete